E-240 vs Pentium M 738
Aggregate performance score
Pentium M 738 outperforms E-240 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 738 and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3341 | 3355 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.23 | 0.63 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | no data | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 738 and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 738 and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 738 and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 738 and E-240 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 738 and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Pentium M 738 has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 80% lower power consumption.
E-240, on the other hand, has a 125% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium M 738 and E-240.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 738 and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
