Ryzen 3 3250U vs Pentium M 730

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 730
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.17
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
+1312%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Pentium M 730 by a whopping 1312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32591770
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency0.6015.14
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache32 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm12 nm
Die size87 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors144 million4500 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.26V-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP5
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 730 0.17
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
+1312%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 730 663
Ryzen 3 3250U 3966
+498%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium M 730 108
Ryzen 3 3250U 14.5
+645%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 2.40
Recency 19 January 2005 6 January 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has a 1311.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 730 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 730 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 730
Pentium M 730
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Pentium M 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2117 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 730 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.