i5-7287U vs Pentium M 735

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18
Core i5-7287U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
2.36
+1211%

Core i5-7287U outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 1211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32451785
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MIntel Core i5
Power efficiency0.817.98
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$304

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate400 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAMno data64 MB
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 2.36
Recency 10 May 2004 3 January 2017
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 300% lower power consumption.

i5-7287U, on the other hand, has a 1211.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-7287U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Core i5-7287U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
Intel Core i5-7287U
Core i5-7287U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Core i5-7287U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Core i5-7287U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.