EPYC 7713P vs Turion 64 MT-32
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7713P outperforms Turion 64 MT-32 by a whopping 28300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3253 | 32 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.13 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.68 | 21.50 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,010 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.79 GHz | 3.68 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 51.12 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 225 Watt |
Turion 64 MT-32 has 800% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7713P, on the other hand, has a 28300% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-32 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 MT-32 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7713P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-32 and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
