Intel started Iris Plus Graphics 650 sales 3 January 2017. This is a Generation 9.5 architecture notebook card based on 14 nm++ manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via Ring Bus interface. Power consumption is at 15 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Iris Plus Graphics 650: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking	651
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.14	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT3e
Market segment	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Iris Plus Graphics 650's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Plus Graphics 650's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed	300 MHz	of 2610 MHz (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	189 million	of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	55.20	of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power	0.8832 TFLOPS	of 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs	6	of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs	48	of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Iris Plus Graphics 650: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width	System Shared	of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	System Shared	of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Shared memory	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Plus Graphics 650. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Plus Graphics 650. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

APIs supported by Iris Plus Graphics 650, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	3.0
Vulkan	1.3

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Iris Plus Graphics 650. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 4.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1757

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 2762

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 1698

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 13153

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 161538

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Plus Graphics 650 555

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Iris Plus Graphics 650 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	10−11
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Metro Exodus	10−11
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	10−12
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	10−11
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Metro Exodus	10−11
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9
Far Cry 5	10−11
Forza Horizon 4	27−30
Hitman 3	10−11
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3
Far Cry 5	5−6
Forza Horizon 4	8−9
Hitman 3	9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11
Metro Exodus	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4
Hitman 3	1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5
Metro Exodus	1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2