EPYC 7513 vs Opteron 242
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 85 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.58 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.66 |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | April 2003 (21 year ago) | 15 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,840 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.65 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | 940 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 200 Watt |
Opteron 242 has 135.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 242 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
