Apple M1 Pro vs EPYC 7F52

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
25.75
+137%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
10.86

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Apple M1 Pro by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking190711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.37no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M-Series
Power efficiency10.11no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3210
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.22 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache8 MB28 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Number of transistors3,800 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt2064 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F52 25.75
+137%
Apple M1 Pro 10.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F52 40756
+137%
Apple M1 Pro 17192

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.75 10.86
Recency 14 April 2020 18 October 2021
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 10
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 2064 Watt

EPYC 7F52 has a 137.1% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and 760% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F52 and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 404 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F52 or Apple M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.