EPYC 7F32 vs EPYC 7371

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7371
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
20.32
+32.6%

EPYC 7371 outperforms EPYC 7F32 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.843.81
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.267.76
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,550$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7371 has 53% better value for money than EPYC 7F32.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier3137
L1 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size213 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors19200 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7371 20.32
+32.6%
EPYC 7F32 15.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7371 31094
+32.6%
EPYC 7F32 23453

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.32 15.32
Recency 13 November 2018 14 April 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 180 Watt

EPYC 7371 has a 32.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7371 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7371 and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7371
EPYC 7371
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7371 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7371 or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.