EPYC 7F32 vs EPYC 7401

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7401
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 170 Watt
34.93
+136%
EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
14.82

EPYC 7401 outperforms EPYC 7F32 by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking106477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.183.60
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency19.367.76
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,850$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7401 has 155% better value for money than EPYC 7F32.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier2037
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7401 34.93
+136%
EPYC 7F32 14.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7401 55280
+136%
EPYC 7F32 23455

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.93 14.82
Recency 29 June 2017 14 April 2020
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 180 Watt

EPYC 7401 has a 135.7% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7401 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7401 and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7401 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7401 or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.