Athlon 64 FX-74 vs E2-3200
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 FX-74 outperforms E2-3200 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2859 | 2858 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.13 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.88 | 0.46 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 7 September 2011 (13 years ago) | November 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $500 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 235 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM1 | F |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6370D | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
E2-3200 has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 FX-74, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-3200 and Athlon 64 FX-74.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
