A8-3550MX vs E1-1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-1500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.25
A8-3550MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.06
+324%

A8-3550MX outperforms E1-1500 by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-1500 and A8-3550MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31512419
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.312.23
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and A8-3550MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and A8-3550MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFS1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and A8-3550MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and A8-3550MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and A8-3550MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-1500 0.25
A8-3550MX 1.06
+324%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1500 398
A8-3550MX 1687
+324%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 1.06
Integrated graphics card 0.33 0.88
Recency 6 January 2013 20 December 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

E1-1500 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 150% lower power consumption.

A8-3550MX, on the other hand, has a 324% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The A8-3550MX is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1500 in performance tests.

Note that E1-1500 is a desktop processor while A8-3550MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and A8-3550MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1500
E1-1500
AMD A8-3550MX
A8-3550MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 161 vote

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate A8-3550MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1500 or A8-3550MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.