A8-3550MX vs i7-2617M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2617M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.06
A8-3550MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.06

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24172416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD A-Series
Power efficiency5.902.23
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size149 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FS1
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2617M 1.06
A8-3550MX 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2617M 1687
A8-3550MX 1687

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.88
Recency 3 January 2011 20 December 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

i7-2617M has 164.7% lower power consumption.

A8-3550MX, on the other hand, has 33.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2617M and A8-3550MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2617M
Core i7-2617M
AMD A8-3550MX
A8-3550MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2617M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 24 votes

Rate A8-3550MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2617M or A8-3550MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.