i7-10700K vs i7-620UM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.69
Core i7-10700K
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
11.86
+1619%

Core i7-10700K outperforms Core i7-620UM by a whopping 1619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2713650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.17
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency3.618.94
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278$400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX-+
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620UM 0.69
i7-10700K 11.86
+1619%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620UM 1091
i7-10700K 18768
+1620%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-620UM 2111
i7-10700K 7910
+275%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-620UM 4004
i7-10700K 50670
+1165%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 11.86
Recency 7 January 2010 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

i7-620UM has 594.4% lower power consumption.

i7-10700K, on the other hand, has a 1618.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-10700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-620UM is a notebook processor while Core i7-10700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UM and Core i7-10700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM
Intel Core i7-10700K
Core i7-10700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1501 vote

Rate Core i7-10700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620UM or Core i7-10700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.