Atom Z620 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date1 February 2010 (14 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data0.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz900 MHz - 1600 MHz (1 core)
Bus typeno datacDMI
Bus rate800 MHz400 MT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cache128 KB56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data65.2526 mm2
Number of transistorsno data140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket P 478Intel BGA 518
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt1.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataPowerVR SGX535

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2010 4 May 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 1 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom Z620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 3400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Atom Z620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Intel Atom Z620
Atom Z620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 35 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom Z620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3300 or Atom Z620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.