Xeon W-3275M vs Pentium P6000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium P6000
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.51
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.11
+4824%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium P6000 by a whopping 4824% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2865197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.01
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency1.3711.54
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1425
L1 cache128 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C76 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium P6000 0.51
Xeon W-3275M 25.11
+4824%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium P6000 810
Xeon W-3275M 39736
+4806%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium P6000 262
Xeon W-3275M 1219
+365%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium P6000 445
Xeon W-3275M 12239
+2650%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 25.11
Recency 20 June 2010 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 205 Watt

Pentium P6000 has 485.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 4823.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium P6000 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium P6000 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium P6000
Pentium P6000
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 67 votes

Rate Pentium P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium P6000 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.