Phenom II X6 1045T vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
+683%
Phenom II X6 1045T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.02

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Phenom II X6 1045T by a whopping 683% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4331927
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.29
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.402.01
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Thuban (2010)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$175

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads226
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data346 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049AM3
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
+683%
Phenom II X6 1045T 2.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25119
+683%
Phenom II X6 1045T 3210

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 2.02
Recency 14 December 2023 1 September 2010
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 22 6
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 95 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 682.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1045T in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1045T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1045T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
Phenom II X6 1045T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 182 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1045T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Phenom II X6 1045T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.