Phenom II X6 1075T vs Ultra 7 155H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.82
+629%
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.17

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Phenom II X6 1075T by a whopping 629% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4251846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.17
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.251.64
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Thuban (2010)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$260

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads226
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data346 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM3
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.82
+629%
Phenom II X6 1075T 2.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25035
+630%
Phenom II X6 1075T 3431

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.82 2.17
Recency 14 December 2023 21 September 2010
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 22 6
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 125 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 629% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1075T in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1075T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Phenom II X6 1075T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 506 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 279 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1075T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Phenom II X6 1075T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.