Atom E3815 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Solo SU3300 outperforms Atom E3815 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3279 | 3349 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 2.27 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Bay Trail-I (2013) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | Intel BGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 8 October 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Atom E3815, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3815 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Atom E3815, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
