Celeron M 925 vs Core 2 Duo T7200

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date28 July 2006 (18 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$286$70

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0375V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2006 1 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7200 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Core 2 Duo T7200
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 109 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7200 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.