Celeron 667 vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2797 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.44 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Timna |
| Release date | August 2007 (17 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 220 mm2 | 129 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2 | 370S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 30 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel i752 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 30 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 667, on the other hand, has 316.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
