Celeron M 925 vs Core 2 Duo SL9380

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date20 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2009 1 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo SL9380 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Celeron M 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9380 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380
Core 2 Duo SL9380
Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SL9380 or Celeron M 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.