Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Celeron SU2300

Place in the ranking	3112	3256
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency	2.84	0.29
Architecture codename	no data	Roma (2005)
Release date	1 July 2009 (15 years ago)	1 June 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	no data	1
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L2 cache	no data	128 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	no data
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
64 bit support	-	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA956	745
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	62/25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron SU2300 0.30
+57.9%

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron SU2300 482
+63.9%

Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.30	0.19
Recency	1 July 2009	1 June 2005
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	62 Watt

Celeron SU2300 has a 57.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.

The Celeron SU2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3300+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Mobile Sempron 3300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.