Celeron SU2300 vs Mobile Sempron 3500+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Architecture codenameKeeneno data
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3500+ 259
Celeron SU2300 482
+86.1%

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron SU2300 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+
Mobile Sempron 3500+
Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3500+ or Celeron SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.