Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Celeron M U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sable (2008−2009)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)4 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz1800 MHz
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M U3400 988
+28%
Mobile Sempron SI-40 772

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 4 July 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Mobile Sempron SI-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.