Turion 64 MT-40 vs Celeron M U3400

Place in the ranking	3106	3193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	Turion 64
Power efficiency	1.52	0.83
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	2.2 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	800 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	90 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	125 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	114 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	BGA1288	754
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M U3400 0.29
+31.8%

Turion 64 MT-40 0.22

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M U3400 988
+21.4%

Turion 64 MT-40 814

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	0.22
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	25 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has a 31.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M U3400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-40 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Turion 64 MT-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.