Atom Z615 vs Celeron M 900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3385not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.22no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno datacDMI
Bus rate800 MHz400 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm265.2526 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C+90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA478T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2.2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
GPIOno data+
FDIno data-
Fast Memory Accessno data-
AMTno data-
Matrix Storageno data-
Quiet Systemno data-
I/O Accelerationno data-
Quick Resumeno data-
HD Audiono data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataPowerVR SGX535
Max video memoryno data256 MB
Clear Videono data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615 integrated GPUs.

LVDSno data+
MIPIno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615.

PCIe versionno dataNone
PCI supportno data-
USB revisionno data2.0
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 4 May 2010
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

Atom Z615 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 1650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Atom Z615, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
Intel Atom Z615
Atom Z615

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom Z615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Atom Z615, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.