VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-53

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64C3-M
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Nehemiah
Release date13 April 2007 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz200 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, PowerNow!, NX-Bitno data
PowerNow+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 12 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-53 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

VIA C3-M C3-M-1500, on the other hand, has 158.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-53
Turion 64 X2 TL-53
VIA C3-M C3-M-1500
C3-M C3-M-1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate VIA C3-M C3-M-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-53 or VIA C3-M C3-M-1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.