Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core 2 Duo T5500 Core 2 Duo T5750 Core 2 Duo T5800 Core 2 Duo T7200 Core 2 Duo T7250 Core 2 Duo T7300 Core 2 Duo T7500 Core 2 Duo T7700 Pentium Dual Core T2370 Pentium Dual Core T2390 Pentium Dual Core T3200 Pentium Dual Core T3400
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 2700+ Athlon 64 L110 Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Contents

Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x Athlon 64
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Hawk-256
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt31 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558
+4.3%

Pros & cons summary

Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 3.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
vs
Pentium M 755 Pentium M 755
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Ryzen 5 7545U Ryzen 5 7545U
Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
vs
i3-2355M Core i3 2355M
Core 2 Duo T5250 Core 2 Duo T5250
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Pentium Dual T2310 Pentium Dual Core T2310
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Pentium Dual SU4100 Pentium Dual Core SU4100
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Celeron M 900 Celeron M 900
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Celeron Dual Core SU2300
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Celeron M 550 Celeron M 550
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium M 745 Pentium M 745
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium SU4100 Pentium SU4100
Celeron N3010 Celeron N3010
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium T2310 Pentium T2310

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.