Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Celeron N3010

Celeron N3000 Celeron N3010 Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060
VS
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.38
+8.6%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.35

Celeron N3010 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron N3010 Celeron N3010
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30273058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron2x Athlon 64
Power efficiency8.981.07
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Hawk-256
Release date10 January 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.04 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3010 0.38
+8.6%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3010 605
+8.4%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3010 169
+1.2%
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 167

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3010 295
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 307
+4.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.38 0.35
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N3010 has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3010 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron N3010
Celeron N3010
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron N3010 Celeron N3010
vs
Celeron N3000 Celeron N3000
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Core 2 Duo SU7300 Core 2 Duo SU7300
Celeron N3010 Celeron N3010
vs
E1-2500 E1 2500
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Celeron Dual Core SU2300
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Celeron M 560 Celeron M 560
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Celeron M 550 Celeron M 550
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium M 745 Pentium M 745
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium SU4100 Pentium SU4100
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Pentium T2310 Pentium T2310
Pentium T2370 Pentium T2370
vs
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
vs
Celeron SU2300 Celeron SU2300
Athlon Neo X2 L325 Athlon Neo X2 L325
vs
Pentium Dual SU4100 Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Athlon Neo X2 L325 Athlon Neo X2 L325
vs
Core 2 Duo L7100 Core 2 Duo L7100

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.2 24 votes

Rate Celeron N3010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3010 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.