Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.35
+16.7%

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30963043
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core2x Athlon 64
Power efficiency2.841.07
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Hawk-256
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.35
+16.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558
+15.8%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1187
+18.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.35
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, on the other hand, has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.