Z-01 vs Celeron M 370
Aggregate performance score
Z-01 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 370 and Z-01 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3300 | 3230 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.68 | 3.00 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Desna (2011) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 370 and Z-01 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 370 and Z-01 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | FT1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Z-01. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A, AMD-V |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 370 and Z-01 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Z-01 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Z-01. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6250 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 6 Watt |
Z-01 has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
The Z-01 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Z-01, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
