Opteron 4334 vs Celeron M 370
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1743 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.48 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron M 370 has 352.4% lower power consumption.
Opteron 4334, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Opteron 4334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
