Core i7-5750HQ vs Celeron M 353
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 15 April 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $434 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 182 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | BGA1364 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 47 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 47 Watt |
Celeron M 353 has 840% lower power consumption.
i7-5750HQ, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Core i7-5750HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
