Turion 64 ML-34 vs Celeron M 353

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MTurion 64
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data754
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 353 has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Turion 64 ML-34, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-34 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Turion 64 ML-34, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.