Celeron E3300 vs M 353

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiencyno data0.73
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 353 has 1200% lower power consumption.

Celeron E3300, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 353 is a notebook processor while Celeron E3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Celeron E3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.