EPYC 9255 vs Celeron J4025

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2526not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.80no data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Turin (2024)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$2,495

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size93 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 1090SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9255 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and EPYC 9255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
AMD EPYC 9255
EPYC 9255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or EPYC 9255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.