A4 PRO-7300B vs Celeron J4025
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J4025 outperforms A4 PRO-7300B by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2532 | 2539 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 8.77 | 1.33 |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | August 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 96 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1024 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 70 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | AMD Radeon HD 8470D |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 192 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.92 | 0.91 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.
A4 PRO-7300B, on the other hand, has 11.5% faster integrated GPU.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and A4 PRO-7300B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
