Celeron J1800 vs J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
+158%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Celeron J4025 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25263050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency8.803.40
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
+158%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
+157%
Celeron J1800 574

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.36
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 4 November 2019 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

Celeron J4025 has a 158.3% higher aggregate performance score, 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron J4025 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.