A4-9120 vs Celeron J4025

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2526	2654
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.67	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	8.80	4.85
Architecture codename	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	4 November 2019 (5 years ago)	1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.5 GHz
L1 cache	56 KB (per core)	160 KB
L2 cache	4 MB (shared)	1 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Die size	93 mm2	124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	no data	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	Intel BGA 1090	BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Virtualization,
AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare

Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)

AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and A4-9120.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	6	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.93	0.77
Integrated graphics card	0.87	1.03
Recency	4 November 2019	1 June 2017
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---