Athlon XP-M 2400+ vs Celeron 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon XP-M
Architecture codenameno dataBarton (2001−2003)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Current price$220 $80

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Bus supportno data266 MT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm213.61 mm × 7.42 mm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm

We couldn't decide between Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 925 and Athlon XP-M 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+
Athlon XP-M 2400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon XP-M 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 925 or Athlon XP-M 2400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.