Celeron 925 vs Turion Neo X2 L625
Primary details
Comparing Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Neo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2009 | 1 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion Neo X2 L625 has 94.4% lower power consumption.
Celeron 925, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
