Athlon XP-M 2400+ vs Celeron 927UE

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon XP-M
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data13.5
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache1 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAA
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 927UE has a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 927UE and Athlon XP-M 2400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 927UE
Celeron 927UE
AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+
Athlon XP-M 2400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 927UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon XP-M 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 927UE or Athlon XP-M 2400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.