Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Celeron 6205

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake U (2020)no data
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)20 November 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2/2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache2.5 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography10 nm16 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1499no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 20 November 2024
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm

Celeron 6205 has a 60% more advanced lithography process.

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6205 or Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.