Celeron 6205 vs M 925

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2/2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2011 1 September 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 6205 has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 925 or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.