Celeron 6205 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 29.33 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 40-core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
