A8 Pro-7150B vs C-50

VS

Primary details

Comparing C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD Kaveri
Power efficiencyno data4.78
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2245 mm2
Number of transistorsno data2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP3
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6250AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-50 265
A8 Pro-7150B 1528
+477%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

C-50 71
A8 Pro-7150B 273
+285%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

C-50 124
A8 Pro-7150B 628
+406%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 4 June 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 19 Watt

C-50 has 111.1% lower power consumption.

A8 Pro-7150B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-50
C-50
AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 268 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-50 or A8 Pro-7150B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.