C-50 vs Solo T1400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo T1400
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1400 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32993290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloAMD C-Series
Power efficiency0.561.69
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (19 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1400 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die size90 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1400 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1400 and C-50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Solo T1400 0.16
C-50 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1400 253
C-50 261
+3.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Solo T1400 95
+17.1%
C-50 111.2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 9 Watt

C-50 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core Solo T1400 and C-50.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400
AMD C-50
C-50

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 269 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1400 or C-50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.