Ultra 9 185H vs Atom N475

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N475
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.11
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.50
+16718%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Atom N475 by a whopping 16718% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3369324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency1.4838.70
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$640

Detailed specifications

Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads222
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Number of transistors123 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GB96 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150Intel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N475 0.11
Ultra 9 185H 18.50
+16718%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N475 179
Ultra 9 185H 29394
+16321%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N475 595
Ultra 9 185H 10244
+1623%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N475 949
Ultra 9 185H 62262
+6461%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N475 544
Ultra 9 185H 14053
+2483%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N475 104.9
Ultra 9 185H 3.71
+2727%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 18.50
Recency 1 June 2010 14 December 2023
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 2 22
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

Atom N475 has 650% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has a 16718.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 1000% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N475 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N475 and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N475
Atom N475
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate Atom N475 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 422 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N475 or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.