Celeron N5095A vs Atom 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data16.34
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-750 MHz
Execution Units-16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A.

PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Celeron N5095A 4116
+2336%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 July 2021
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

Atom 230 has 275% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 98 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.