Celeron 847E vs Athlon 64 X2 4000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.44
+18.9%
Celeron 847E
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.37

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ outperforms Celeron 847E by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29623046
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.472.06
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$111

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache512K512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size220 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors154 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 0.44
+18.9%
Celeron 847E 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692
+18.5%
Celeron 847E 584

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195
+2.6%
Celeron 847E 190

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363
+7.4%
Celeron 847E 338

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 0.37
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 17 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ has a 18.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 847E, on the other hand, has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847E in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 847E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron 847E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 191 vote

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4000+ or Celeron 847E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.